Study of gooseberry cultivars in cultivation without artificial irrigation
Abstract
This paper presents the results of the studies on berries yield and quality of the introduced gooseberry cultivars such as «Kolobok», «Smena», «Kaptivator», «Grushenka», «Sadko» and «Severny kapitan». Gooseberry plantation was planted in 2000 in the area without artificial irrigation at the planting distance 2.5 x 1.0 m. The yield was estimated for 2003-2006. It was found that the studied cultivars were influenced by stress climatic conditions from the Republic of Moldova. It was a small amount of annual rainfall (volume more than 376.4 to 660.3 mm) insufficient for plants development, especially during the growing season as its volume didn»t exceed 236.7-414.5 mm and also high temperatures more than 15 to 18.77 º C and low air humidity within 62-64 %. The results showed that the average weight of gooseberries at cultivars ranged from 2.0 g at «Severny kapitan» and up to 3.2 g at the cultivar «Smena». Weight variation limit of gooseberries at cultivars ranged from 1.5 to 4.1 g. The average yield of gooseberry cultivars ranged from 0.5 kg/bush at the cultivar «Grushenka» and to 3.8 kg/bush at the cultivar «Severny kapitan», with a limit of yield variation which ranged from 0.3 to 5.2 kg/bush. The cultivar «Grushenka» does not stand moisture deficit and as a result of high temperatures, there is a fruit abscission
About the Author
P. Sаvа
Научно-практический институт садоводства и продовольственных технологий
Moldova, Republic of
Moldova, Republic of
References
1. Mladin, Gh. Cultura arbuştilor fructiferi pe spaţii restrânse / Gh. Mladin, Paulina Mladin. – Bucureşti, 1992. – P. 135-149.
2. Mihăiescu, G. Pomicultura specială / G. Mihăiescu. – Bucureşti, 1977. – Р. 326-328.
3. Хапова, С. Все о ягодных культурах: лучшие сорта, новые растения. Атлассправочник садовода / С. Хапова. – Ярославль, 2003. – С. 5-12; 31-42.
4. Залетило, А. Сортоизучение крыжовника в Северо-Казахстанской области / А. Залетило // Сб. науч. работ ВНИИС им. И.В. Мичурина. – Мичуринск, 1975. – Вып. 21. – С. 43-47.
5. Сорокопудов, В.Н. Крыжовник в Сибири / В.Н. Сорокопудов, Е.А. Мелькумова, О.А. Сорокопудов. – Новосибирск, 1999. – 92 с.
6. Hoza, D. Cultura căpşunului, semi-arbuştilor şi arbuştilor fructiferi / D. Hoza. – Bucureşti, 2000. – Р. 184-224.
7. Поздняков, А. Ягодные кустарники / А. Поздняков. – Москва, 1992. – C. 34-35.
8. Киртбая, Е. Kультура крыжовника (рекомендации) / Е. Киртбая. – Краснодар, 1990. – С. 12-13.
9. Burzo, I. Fiziologia plantelor de cultură. Procesele fiziologice din plantele de cultură / I. Burzo [et al.]. – Chişinău, 1999. – Vol. 1. – P. 199-202.
10. Baker, Harry. The fruit garden displayed, royal Horticultural society, N. D. H. Garden Wisley / Harry Baker. – London, 1986. – P. 194-201.
11. Voiculescu, N. Condiţii ecopedologice pentru cultura arbuştilor fructiferi / N. Voiculescu [et al.] // Lucrări Ştiinţifice, Seria B, XL. – Bucureşti, 1999. – P. 87-92.
12. Ştefîrţă, A. Metodele noi de diagnosticare şi ameliorare a rezistenţei plantelor la un deficit moderat de umezeală / A. Ştefîrţă [et al.] // Fiziologia şi biochimia plantelor la început de mileniu: Realizări şi perspective: Mater. Conr. II, Societatea de Fiziologie şi Biochimie Vegetală din Republica Moldova. – Chişinău, 2001. – P. 342-348.
13. Sava, Parascovia. Capacitatea de protecţie a rădăcinilor de agriş contra secetei / Parascovia Sava // ―Horticultura modernă – realizări şi perspective‖, dedicat aniversării a 70 ani ai facultăţii de Horticultură a Universităţii Agrare de Stat din Moldova: simpozionului ştiinţific internaţional. – Chişinău, 2010. – Vol. 24. – P. 185-189.
Review
For citations:
Sаvа P. Study of gooseberry cultivars in cultivation without artificial irrigation. Fruit Growing. 2013;25(1):427-432. (In Russ.)
Views: 132
Email this article 